![]() Figure 26. Patterns for fruit or acid drops that could be bought from Thomas Mills & Brother, Inc. of Philadelphia in the 1930s. |
|
UNSEASONAL fruit which has never been near a tree is a recurring theme in confectionery. A whole dessert of perfect orchard produce and berries could be shaped from marzipan or cast sugar, artfully coloured and piled in baskets as if fresh from the garden. At a sweetmeat banquet, this conceit was as valued for its artifice as the originals were esteemed for freshness and beauty. The epitome of that banquet experience is the fruit drop, whose allure lies in the massing of shapes and the sparkling colour, intense and glowing like gemstones. There are two notable things about fruit drops (and acid drops, and other boiled sweets). They are transparent and they have gone quite quickly from being a technical novelty to something banal. Clear sugar sweets are now so ubiquitous that they seem a logical outcome of sugar-boiling but they represent centuries of progressive technique, control, and ingenuity in the use of flavours and colours. In 1932, Fred Steel wrote: 'To the confectioner who is not interested in chocolate covering, the sweet of greatest interest is, without doubt, the hard-boiled drop. There is in this class of goods ample scope for the confectioner to display his skill.' Hard-boiled drops have now been relegated to the niche of 'old time favourites'. The discovery that tartaric acid prevented the sugar from graining at high temperatures eased the sugar-boiler's trials when making transparent boiled sweets. In his tradesman's handbook, Skuse spelt out the problem and its solution:
|
Not that confectioners were aware of this; they just knew if they followed the rules, the result would be beautiful, translucent, gem-like confections. It was all part of the semi-magical world of sugar-work. From the 1680s, when Giles Rose translated the term casse, until the early nineteenth century, confectioners remained circumspect about high-temperature boiling, although they did have one advantage over the modern sugar-boiler in beginning with clarified syrup. This meant all sugar was properly dissolved. When the starting point is granulated sugar and water, the confectioner must ensure every crystal of sugar is dissolved before it begins to boil. This recipe, translated by Giles Rose, might have produced something
approaching a modern high-boiled drop: |
Gilliers described grain as a confectioner's expression for little globules
of sugar, the size of a grain of corn, in a preserve or sugar cooked to
caramel. He recognized various causes, amongst which were over- cooking
preserves, insufficient lemon juice, or badly clarified sugar. Graisser
was the term he used for sugar cooked to caramel with lemon juice added.
Shortly afterwards, this appeared in English as 'greasing' |
|
the sugar. It was not long before it was clear that confectioners in England knew about preventing grain, as shown by Jarrin's recipe for transparent barley sugar: When the sugar is near the crack, add to it two or three drops of lemon juice to prevent its graining, or a little vinegar or alum dissolved in water; any acid will grease sugar.'
Acids had been combined with sugar for centuries: naturally occurring ones were added inadvertently with fruit juices used for flavourings and others were added for special effects. Some juices worked well as doctors even when the effect was not desired. Jarrin warned readers to be careful with barberry, raspberry and pineapple juices because they would grease the sugar. Lemon juice was considered most effective and convenient, perhaps because it had little flavouring effect. William Finemore recommended that a glass container should be marked with graduations of a teaspoonful on the sides specially for adding the appropriate amount of lemon juice. Tartaric acid was widely used, as well as less palatable substances such as vitriol. The best confectioners were careful over their choice of doctor. Skuse remarked:
|
|
Tartaric acid and cream of tartar had the advantage over lemon juice that they were available as a powder. Stored in a dry place, they kept almost indefinitely. Under the older name of argil, tartar had been known as a crystalline deposit on the inside of wine-barrels. The original reason for adding it to confectionery remains a mystery. It may have been considered good for one's health, or it may have entered the sweet-making process on the back of another ingredient: it was often used in formulae for making cochineal colour. Butter and cream (and other fats, such as palm or coconut oil) are another category of doctor; they work because the molecules of protein and fat involved are very different to those of sugar. They were not used for transparent sweets but were important in toffee making. Toffee boilers also used molasses which, with honey and glucose, form a third group. For many confectioners, glucose remained an unknown quantity into the 1890s, when Skuse was obliged to explain:
|
4 lb Lump Sugar-pint of Water-boil to the Ball-add 2/4 Teaspoonsfull of Lemon Juice-boil to the crack-pour it on a very clean and well oiled marble Slab then add to the Sugar 1 oz of Tartaric Acid and a little Essence of Lemon mould it well to mix in the Acid-put it into a tin-Oiled- before the Fire to keep it hot-cut off pieces as you want it roll it on a marble slab dusted with powdered Sugar cut with Scissors into small pieces and rolled quite round on a Penbrie Slab-and flattened-then put into powdered Sugar
Same as Lemon Acid Drops coloured with Cochineal Colour-and flavoured with Otto [attar] of Rose. |
|
when English marauders foraging plums for supplies were worsted by the Scots. In the eighteenth century, confectioners making boiled sugar relied heavily on flavours which had long been in use, including flowers (rose, violet, orange flower, carnation) and spices (cinnamon, clove, ginger). Acid was used occasionally, probably for supposed medicinal value or visual and flavouring effect. An instance is Culpeper's suggestion to add vitriol to violet cordial to redden it and sharpen the taste. The range of fruit flavours open to confectioners was limited. Jarrin and his West End colleagues could afford to buy pineapples and other fruit and employ journeymen to extract the juice, but even they must have encountered problems such as the instability of some flavours at high temperatures. For the less ambitious, options were limited. Stavely suggested only peppermint, lemon essence, ginger and horehound for the small provincial confectioner making candy and pulled sugar. William Finemore's notes also show only a few flavours in use with boiled sugar. Apart from tartaric acid and otto [attar] of rose, he mentions
|
|
|
mint oil, ginger, clove oil, essence of lemon and 'raspberry'. The latter was actually orris root and tartaric acid in red-coloured sugar. Rose was a flavour with a very long precedent. The combination of it with acid shows a transition in taste: the sensation of sharp and sweet combined with familiar floweriness. Rose acid was described as a transparent sweet by Henry Mayhew, suggesting this was still a novelty in 1850. Acidity and texture continued to be exploited, but flavours changed and the range expanded, swinging away from flowers and spices. This was partly due to developments in applied chemistry, displayed with many other achievements at the Great Exhibition of 1851. One advance, breathlessly reported by the Illustrated London News, was the synthesis of artificial flavourings:
|
|
sweets suddenly meant that everyone could taste fruit at any time of the year. For a few decades, high-boiled drops were probably seen as an affordable substitute for fruit, at least by the poor. They combined sophisticated sugar work, bright colour, fancy shapes and flavours which only the rich were usually privileged to taste. The twentieth- century view is that sweets are decidedly inferior: given the choice between a ripe dessert pear and a pear drop there is little contest. Consider the differences. A perfectly ripe pear is that late twentieth- century oxymoron- a healthy, low calorie, virtuous treat. It is soft, juicy, perfumed and generally delicious, turns bad in a few days, and the season is short. What about the pear drop? It is small, approximately pear shaped, any colour the confectioner fancies but usually half red, half yellow. Dry and hard, pear drops have little smell until someone else is eating them, when they produce a strong aroma reminiscent of pear, with the addition of a curious and intense sweetness which catches at the top of the nose. They keep forever (several months, anyway). As sweets, they have acquired many negative implications to do with calorie content and dental caries. Now imagine you are a child of a poor family in an industrial town of the 1860s. Pears, during the few short weeks when they appeared in the greengrocers, were expensive, smelt delicious. There are no pears on the market stalls at present (not much fresh fruit of any sort at this time of year), but the sweet-stuff seller has a new line of bright red and yellow sugar drops which, he says, taste just like the preserved Jargonelle pears that the quality eat, so you buy a few with a penny earned for running an errand and are soon enjoying the flavour. Of the contradictions behind fruit drops, the altered status of sugar
is the one now most apparent. Expensive, it was valued by the rich; once
cheap, sugar was fantasy land for the poor. It represented dreams whose
only limitation was the skill and imagination of the confectioner. Objects
wrought in transparent sugar were diverse: classical statues, pineapples,
pistols, fish... whatever the confectioner |
|
thought would appeal to the customers. If real fruit wasn't available, or was too expensive, it could always be modelled using syrup cast in moulds or bits of fruit paste. In the twentieth century the dogma is 'fresh fruit good; sugar confectionery bad' and 'natural is best, artifice is wrong'. Yet artifice has always lain behind getting any out-of-season or exotic fruit to the table. Now it goes into transport and packaging, not the use of sugar as a preservative. In the past, the taste of preserved fruit represented luxury, and the growing control confectioners had over making transparent, flavoured sugar shapes was an admirable novelty. Pears and pear drops, fruit and fruit drops- the sweets were models of the real thing, a glimpse of possibilities. Acid drops and fruit drops were the saccharine distillate of the art of preserving fruit. While almost the product of the laboratory, it represented a real desire to offer the sweet acidity of fruit itself to palates reluctant to accept the imperative of summer bounty succeeded by winter's pale dearth. Preserved fruit had been a status symbol for centuries. Before canning, freezing and air freight, sugar was the only medium of conservation available. Most books on sugar work devoted much space to the subject; some give the impression that confectioners did little else. Almost two-thirds of Mrs Mary Eales's Receipts for instance, is occupied by instruction on preserving. Originally, the technique was used for more than merely keeping the fruit from rotting. Fresh fruit was regarded as suspect by physicians, who thought it mostly 'cold' in humoral terms. In the seventeenth century, Tobias Venner thought quinces, peaches and apricots cold and dry, apples and pears cold and moist with a 'crude and windie moisture', but that marmalade cotiniate (quince paste with sugar) was 'verie delectable to the taste and stomack'. Preserving with sugar (which was moderately hot) made delicious sweetmeats that tempered the coldness of the fruit. |
![]() Figure 32. Figure moulds for clear sugar 'toys', from Thomas Mills & Brother, Inc. of Philadelphia in the 1930s. Each figure would have weighed about one-third of an ounce, 10-15 grams. |
|
Fruit sweetmeats, including a few using honey, can be traced back to the earliest collections of recipes. The confectioner faced with a glut of fruit had three options: preserve It whole (in syrup or candied); cook to a homogenous paste; extract the juice and boil it with sugar to make a jelly. In skilful hands, all three were exploited for decorative, beautifully coloured and flavoured sweetmeats. Preserving whole involved a serious attempt to conserve the integrity of fruits so that they appeared as natural as possible. All recipes for preserves or 'suckets' began by cooking fruit gently, and then steeping in syrup over several days. The syrup was concentrated by boiling a little more each day (if a concentrated syrup is used initially, the fruit toughens and shrivels). Finally, fruit and syrup were transferred to gallipots or glasses and sealed with bladder or paper until needed. Drained, the preserves could be sprinkled with fine sugar, or candied by dipping them in sugar boiled to candy height so encasing each piece in a sugar shell. The method uses syrups boiled to relatively low temperatures. Candied fruits are still made with varying degrees of skill in France, Italy, Spain, Portugal and their former colonies. The quantities of sugar required, as well as the time and expertise, make these expensive and luxurious sweetmeats even now. The other options of making pastes or jellies destroyed the form of the fruit but allowed more freedom with colour, texture and shape. Many sweetmeats took the colour of the fruit from which they were made: pale, pinky beiges from apples or pears, the warm oranges of peaches or apricots, deep pinks and reds from berries. Confectioners also learnt to manipulate colour in some fruit. Rapid open boiling of quinces produced a pale, orange-red paste, or 'quince paste white' (white was a relative term); slow, close-covered simmering made a deeper colour, 'quince paste red'. Fruit for paste is cooked to a homogenous mass, then boiled with an
equal weight of sugar until it sets when cold. Getting this right was a
matter of experience. Quinces were popular because their high pectin content
meant paste made from them set reliably. For fancy |
|
work such as 'jumballs' (knots), paste had to be quite dry, so that it became slightly elastic and strong enough to be worked by rolling into lengths. Alternatively, paste was simply cut in lozenges or other shapes. Coated with powder sugar, it would have been not unlike a soft version of a fruit pastille. Apple paste was sometimes coloured and shaped to counterfeit fruit such as cherries; adding a stalk to each piece completed the effect. Making fruit jellies began in the same way as paste, but involved straining the cooked fruit to extract the juice. Again, quinces were the archetypal fruit for the method. Both pastes and jellies could be elaborately moulded or 'printed' with motifs, as in Sir Hugh Plat's recipe:
Take the kernells out of eight great Quinces, and boile them in a quart of spring water, till it come to a pinte, then put into it a quarter of a pinte of Rosewater and one pound of fine Sugar, and so let it boile till you see it come to bee of a deepe colour: then take a drop, and drop it on the bottome of a sawcer, and if it stand, take it off, then let it run through a jelly bagge into a bason upon a chafing dish of coles to keep it warm, then take a spoone, and fill your boxes as full as you please... and if you please, printe it in mouldes. Getting pastes and jellies to setting consistency without spoiling the
flavour by overboiling must have been problematic with many fruits. Confectioners
boosted the pectin content of some fruit by adding juice from cooked apples
or gooseberries. Another method for encouraging setting was to make 'clear
cakes,' as told by Eliza Smith: |
|
Take your gooseberries, or other fruit, and put them in an earthen pot, stopt very close, and put them in a kettle of water, and let them boil till they break ... run them through a cloth; take the weight of the liquor in sugar; boil the sugar candy high; then put in your juice, and let it stand over a few embers to dry till it is thick like a jelly ... pout it into clear cake glasses and dry them with a little fire.
|
|
For an authentic seventeenth-century flavour, if you can obtain a little ambergris to use in place of the vanilla, a scrap the size of a rice grain will be plenty. Put the sugar and water in a small pan and heat gently, stirring to dissolve all crystals. Increase the heat and boil to the upper end of hard crack, about 154°C. Immediately remove the pan from the fire and quench it by dipping the base quickly in a bowl of cold water. Add the ambergris or vanilla, and allow to melt into the mixture. Quickly drop the syrup in small rounds on the oiled slab or tray and leave to cool. ![]() Figure 33. The fruit bonbon: the fruit paste centre relies on a centuries-old technique, whilst the crunchy casing is similar to high-boiled sugar used in fruit drops. |
|
Always handle hot sugar with caution. If it becomes too stiff to work
easily, heat it at the open door of a warm oven (about 160°C, Gas 3). |
|
1kg apples .1 litre water 100ml rosewater . 500g granulated sugar Wash the fruit and remove any blemishes; cut into quarters
or eighths, depending on size; discard the pips. Put in a pan with the
litre of water and cook gently, stirring occasionally. As the fruit disintegrates
quite fast and the chances of it sticking increase, stir more as it thickens.
Add the sugar and rosewater. When reduced to a well-cooked pulp, take the
pan off the heat and run the contents through a jelly bag into a clean
pan. It is better not to let it drip too long, because there is a small
risk of the pectin beginning to set-about 60-90 minutes should be enough.
The remaining puree can be sieved and mixed with cream or custard for a
fool. Bring the syrup back to a gentle boil, skim and allow to reduce a
little. Check for setting by dropping a little on a cold saucer and when
it makes a very firm jelly, run into the dishes or boxes to a depth of
about 1 cm. Apples of the pippin type (for example, Cox) make an acceptable
quidini, although quinces work better. If quinces are available, substitute
them for the apples. Remember that they take much longer to soften and
do not collapse to a puree as apples do, and that they also contain very
strong pectin, so the chances of the juice setting after it drips through
the bag are increased. Seventeenth-century confectioners also suggest using
plums and raspberries, but these do not set as reliably. I find the colour
produced by quinces and apples during cooking unpredictable: generally,
the longer and slower they are cooked, the deeper and redder they become. |
|
Wash the damsons and put in a pan with the wine. Cook gently until they have disintegrated. Push through a sieve or a mouli-legumes, discarding stones and skin. Weigh the pulp and measure (in a separate bowl) an equal amount of sugar. Return the pulp to a clean pan and stir it over medium heat for 5-10 minutes to dry it a little. Add the sugar, stir well to dissolve, and cook fairly briskly. Stir constantly until the paste thickens and a wooden spoon leaves a trail when drawn across the bottom of the pan. Remove from the heat and pour into the lined tin, shaking gently to level the paste. Leave overnight to cool. Next day, dredge a board or tray with granulated sugar and turn the paste onto it. Peel off the paper, and sugar the top of the paste as well. Cut into lozenges, toss in sugar and store in a box with sheets of paper between the layers. Other stone fruit such as apricots and peaches also make good paste,
but use white wine with these. |